PDA

View Full Version : Bungals




ChrisMcGTO04
09-17-2007, 09:28 PM
I'm betting the Bungals give up 70 to the Patsies in a few weeks.

What's the most points allowed in an NFL game? I'm too lazy to look it up...:drink:




GoatLovin
09-17-2007, 09:32 PM
The Cheatsies will hopefully be barred from the NFL by then.

Belichick is a cheater. Anyone on the Pats who knew he was cheating and did nothing about is a cheater by association and also a coward. He took it to another level.

ChrisMcGTO04
09-17-2007, 09:34 PM
The Cheatsies will hopefully be barred from the NFL by then.

Belichick is a cheater. Anyone on the Pats who knew he was cheating and did nothing about is a cheater by association and also a coward. He took it to another level.

I'm a Bengals fan and have a large disdain for the Pats....but the Bengals couldn't stop a small leak in the sink.

It's going to be embarassing for the defense....ugggghhhh....:bomb:

Napoleon_Tanerite
09-17-2007, 09:55 PM
defense wins championships, and the bengals have none. looks like they were 2005's one year wonder, and new orleans is quickly on the way to becoming 2006's.

Napoleon_Tanerite
09-17-2007, 09:55 PM
hrm... do posts in here increase the post count?

Napoleon_Tanerite
09-17-2007, 09:56 PM
nope!

ChrisMcGTO04
09-17-2007, 09:58 PM
defense wins championships, and the bengals have none. looks like they were 2005's one year wonder, and new orleans is quickly on the way to becoming 2006's.

Not entirely true.....case in point the Chicago Bears...:drink:

Napoleon_Tanerite
09-17-2007, 10:02 PM
can have more than one one year wonder per year

ref: the 2003 superbowl participants...

GT_Owned
09-17-2007, 10:46 PM
honestly, you never know with the bengals. i just want to see chad dance. :bootyshak:bubbrub

1969 SS
09-18-2007, 07:18 AM
Not entirely true.....case in point the Chicago Bears...:drink:
I think they got there by default

Red Bearded Goat
09-18-2007, 07:25 AM
Not entirely true.....case in point the Chicago Bears...:drink:

Counter point 2000 Ravens..... :damnyou:

Midnight
09-18-2007, 07:34 AM
I think they got there by default

As a Bears fan, I am OFFENDED by your comment.
















No matter how true it is. :bomb:

BIGGIE.azGTO
09-18-2007, 09:00 AM
^^^^^:nono: The Bears lost the SuperBowl because of Rex Chokeman. They had more then enough D. to win that game

Midnight
09-18-2007, 09:04 AM
^^^^^:nono: The Bears lost the SuperBowl because of Rex Chokeman. They had more then enough D. to win that game

^^^^^Agreed - wholeheartedly.

The assertion was that the Bears got there by default. I agree with that as well. Who in the NFC was going to challenge them? The Saints? The Seagulls? The Cowgirls?

Same question applies to this season - who is going to challenge the Bears in the Junior Varsity Conference - ummm, NFC? Maybe the Packers? Maybe the 49ers? Maybe the Deadskins?

1969 SS
09-18-2007, 09:09 AM
As a Bears fan, I am OFFENDED by your comment. No matter how true it is. :bomb:

I really respect the Bears Defense but Rex is one of the worse out there. imagine him on a marginally talented team? he would be benched for ANY rookie

BIGGIE.azGTO
09-18-2007, 09:12 AM
I read on the internet that Jake PLummer was is Chi town, and when asked by reporters he was just checkingout the town:confused:

Is this even possible, if so, would it be a good thing?

Midnight
09-18-2007, 09:48 AM
I really respect the Bears Defense but Rex is one of the worse out there. imagine him on a marginally talented team? he would be benched for ANY rookie

Even though you're right, I wish he was a good QB. Hell, I would settle for average at this point!

I read on the internet that Jake PLummer was is Chi town, and when asked by reporters he was just checkingout the town:confused:

Is this even possible, if so, would it be a good thing?

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc170/tsherick/ orlyanim.gif

BIGGIE.azGTO
09-18-2007, 10:01 AM
^^^^^ I started a Bears thread

PeleProdigyGTO
09-18-2007, 10:22 AM
honestly, you never know with the bengals. i just want to see chad dance. :bootyshak:bubbrub

Me too, that guy is hilarious.

ChrisMcGTO04
09-25-2007, 08:19 PM
Bump for the embarassment the Bungals will bring to themselves next Monday night...

Midnight
09-26-2007, 02:43 AM
It's gonna be ugly...

elpuerco
09-26-2007, 03:33 AM
Highest Scoring Game (both combined and single team) was:

Redskins' 72-41 victory over the Giants on Nov. 27, 1966.

Will there be a new record?

Jizz
09-26-2007, 03:40 AM
Highest Scoring Game (both combined and single team) was:

Redskins' 72-41 victory over the Giants on Nov. 27, 1966.

Will there be a new record?

Yes but it will be all Pats scoring.

Midnight
09-26-2007, 05:38 AM
Highest Scoring Game (both combined and single team) was:

Redskins' 72-41 victory over the Giants on Nov. 27, 1966.

Will there be a new record?

Maybe combined scoring, but the Bears beat the Redskins 73-0 in the 1940 NFL Championship game. :judge:

Maybe post-season doesn't count.

Yes but it will be all Pats scoring.

Monday's new scoring record...

Patriots 114 -- Bengals 0

ZigZag
09-26-2007, 05:40 AM
Highest Scoring Game (both combined and single team) was:

Redskins' 72-41 victory over the Giants on Nov. 27, 1966.

Will there be a new record?

Don't think so, if it gets ugly they'll pull the starters like last week but only earlier.

1969 SS
09-26-2007, 08:30 AM
Don't think so, if it gets ugly they'll pull the starters like last week but only earlier.

and I love that because it is giving our backup QB some valuable seat time

elpuerco
09-26-2007, 09:00 AM
These predictions remind me of teh old Bears Superfan SNL skits:

Gee I tink da score will be...

Hurricaine Andrew 4
Dit-ka 326

It is going to be bad though, and they will pull the starters if they are up by like 4 TDs.