because its only common sense that leaving the the kind of gap that this 'velocity ring' or what ever fills might just cause enough turbulence, and that is likely to cause the driveability issues we're seeing.
a 12mm difference is pretty significant if you think about it, and when given small amounts of throttle the airflow will be all fubar for the first couple intake runners until the motor gets going
Is it a dick move by FAST to say the smaller TB's work? Sure. but its not like a parts maker would lie or anything.
yeah everyone knows that anything you read on the interwebz is the truth!
Personally, i think the forums downfall has been AF's policy of letting anyone with a check book be a sponsor. for every decent one we have, we have 5 bags of dicks.
and as far as the moderation thing, its not even worth trying to moderate anything involving a sponsor. If the sponsor doesnt like a member asking a question, or pointing out a flaw or correcting any error, no matter the 'tone' used, they go crying to AF, or making threats about lawsuits. Its all very very lame. So as long as it doesnt devolve into name calling, its allowed to run.
wow, that is really really lame
As far as the 102 TB not being needed on stock cubes/non-fi, i agree. Im not entirely sure the 102 manifold is needed for stock cubes either. I just find it shocking that after years of dick-riding FAST over a few mm's, all of a sudden that has stopped. If you were running a 78mm on a 90, youd be a tard, but all of a sudden running a 90/92 on a 102 is fine, but here's a ring for you.
IIRC the 102mm intake wasnt really needed unless you are running on the max end of the CI for lsx blocks or cramming mass amounts of air into a still larger than stock CI motor. hell, the majority of people that build a motor wont even get close to maxing out the 90mm opening on the intake... if anything, most the time they will make less power over the first 75% of the rpm range