Btlfed1500 said:
Steel TWISTen (or chicken whatever ..),
So now you make childish personal attacks....um ok.
Are you trying to make the claim that you are attempting to "pass someone" or to "run after" but not going to go to WOT and that you would not down shift? Passing someone at part throttle in 4th gear @ 2000 rpm ... thats around 40-45 mph. Passing in itself is reference to applying more throttle hense such phrases as "downshifting into passing gear." 40 mph runs are suited to 2nd and thrid gear ratios not 4th ... I can see why your not happy with your car.
First of all, when did I say im not happy with my car? WTF dude? I love the way my car runs. Second, what kinda bullshit are you talking about? Everytime you pass someone or need to accelerate, you HAVE to go WOT or downshift? Seriously, do you drive WOT all the time?
If you are scooting around on the street and you dont care about making peak power, why are you worried about how efficient your motor is or what power it makes? Honestly what you are trying to say is quite contradictory.
No it isn't. Ill try to keep it simple for you. Lets Car A makes twice as much power @ 2K RPM @ WOT then car B. Car A will be MORE responsive and more perky @ partial throttle then car B at part throttle, because of the efficency differences. If you can't get that, im done trying to explain it to you.
Anyhow, A dyno pass is conducted at WOT ... showing a HP curve at 2000 rpm at WOT in 4th gear only shows what happens at WOT. You next statement is assinine in that you are trying to draw lines to part throttle performance based upon number achieved at WOT in 4th gear? How does knowing what happens at WOT indicate anything as to what happens at part throttle? You claim to be a "tuner," so tell me HOW cruise and WOT timing and fueling values are the same in OL and CL at different throttle angles. They are NOT, and in that case even a person with basic understanding which i feel you entirely lack, would be able to conclude that different timing advance and different fueling will net different power. So agian, why show WOT data for rpm values not attributed to WOT performance? Why make assumptions as to what part throttle power based up on WOT power when they share NO common ground ... you are the one misleading people in YOUR assumptions, charts are charts.
More uncalled for personal insults. Thats very professional of you. Does it NOT occur to you that some other factors besides the timing and fueling are at play? I dont know, like maybe the exhaust, or CAM SPECIFICATIONS? jesus dude. This is really very basic stuff. A cam that makes big power at high rpms will make less power at low RPMS REGARDLESS OF HOW YOU TUNE IT, and it WILL SHOW UP IN THE WOT GRAPH, and INTELLIGENT person MIGHT be able to draw a conclusions that such a cam might be TOO MUCH CAM FOR THEIR NEEDS, but they would never know that if some ARROGANT person decides THEY DONT NEED TO SEE IT.
No one is hiding anything you delusional paranoid ... showing irrelivant info does nothing to serve anyone, only fuel internet know-it-all terrorists like yourself.
Then show it? If theres nothing to hide, show the data. Let people see it for themselves. And stop with the childish attacks, please.
You're diluted and confused ... I posted a chart with NO assumptions and NO conclusions drawn on my part. No one made ANY conclusions except yourself. Get a life, you're the one that feels someone is out there to descieve you ... that you are one some cruisade to enlighten those to the worlds evil's, LOL ... sadly you humor me.
Im confused? What chart are you talking about? Are you in the wrong thread? WTF?
You want to disagree and argue with me, fine, we all can learn something... but stop being a insulting prick about it.
