A lot of people have said to me that the poly mounts are better than the rubber ones are because the poly ones do not collapse.
I can not deny that when the mounts are removed from the car they will not be collapsed.
This however does not mean that they are 'better' or 'stronger', it just means that when you remove them from the car they are not collapsed.
This may sound like i'm talking in circles, but let me try to explain.
The Pedders Mounts are steel encased in rubber, the steel/rubber mounts are designed to collapse to help protect your cars structure. If they have collapsed, it's because the car has hit a bump (or bumps) with enough force that the design has allowed the mount to compress a bit to prevent the structure damage.
Just because a mount is collapsed does not mean that it's not doing it's job well, it just means that it has lost it's protectability (i made that word up). The main function of the strut mount is to prevent the lateral movement of the strut shaft (side to side and front to rear) the secondary purpose is to secure it up and down. So a collapsed mount can do the job 100% fine, and have zero performance degradation.
Now to the poly mounts.
Why are poly mounts not the ideal design?
It's simple, they are a very low cost (to manufacture) alternative, since they are not steel re-enforced, and have not been designed to allow themselves to collapse when a large bump/pothole is hit. So because they are simply a solid poly piece, when they are not under pressure they will be the same height.
The problem is when they ARE under pressure.
Since they are under so much pressure, and they don't have the steel re-enforcement, they can tend to allow the strut shaft to move not only laterally, but also up and down. I liken it to a sponge. You can take a sponge, squish it down, twist it, warp it, bend it, ect, but when you take the pressure off of the sponge it returns to it's original form.
Now i'm not suggesting that you use a sponge for a strut mount, but then again, i'm not suggesting that you use a poly strut mount either.
I have a Pedders Poly Strut Mount.
I be happy to show it to people, but it will never be installed on a car.
Pedders doesn't make parts just to sell them, they make parts to improve your car, and they are designed to be on a daily driven car.
Since the only way to attempt to offset the poor qualities that the poly mounts can have, is to make them very hard, this means that there will be an NVH issue. But even after making them hard, they will still have the same issues with movement and flexing.
I've removed more than a couple sets of these from GTOs and G8s over the past couple years.
So, i ask that you think about one thing, why doesn't Pedders sell poly mounts when they use poly in so many applications?
It's late and i may have babbled a bit, but i think that i've gotten my point across.
If you choose poly mounts it's your call, i can't change that.
What i can do is inform you of the issues that are present with poly mounts, and explain why the OE mounts as well as Pedders mounts are designed how they are.